Who Is the FTX Hacker? On-Chain Clues Shed Light on the Situation 

The tackle that transferred roughly $372 million from FTX possible belongs to a black hat hacker. 

Who Hacked FTX?

Debate is raging over who hacked FTX.

The embattled crypto trade was hacked on November 12, hours after it filed for Chapter 11 voluntary chapter. In accordance with a November 17 court filing from FTX CEO John J. Ray III, an unknown entity transferred at the very least $372 million from FTX to an exterior pockets. “FTX has been hacked. All funds appear to be gone,” an admin going by Rey wrote on FTX’s official Telegram channel. 

In response to the hack, a second pockets with connections to a know-your-customer verified account on the crypto trade Kraken began transferring funds out of FTX. A later submitting from the Securities Fee of The Bahamas signifies that former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried was working this pockets and transferring funds on the regulator’s route to “shield the pursuits of purchasers and collectors.” This prevented an estimated $200 million value of funds from being taken by the primary hacker.

Nonetheless, whereas this was going down, the first wallet, assumed to be a so-called “black hat” hacker working with malicious intent, began changing stolen belongings into Ethereum, MakerDAO’s DAI stablecoin, and BNB Chain’s native token whereas additionally sending funds by way of a wide range of cross-chain token bridges. The attacker possible did so to forestall their ill-gotten beneficial properties from being frozen. It’s a lesser-known proven fact that stablecoins equivalent to USDC and USDT have freeze and blacklist capabilities constructed into their contracts, permitting their respective issuers to halt transactions and confiscate funds manually. 

As time was of the essence, the hacker incurred a large quantity of slippage from swapping enormous quantities of tokens in fast succession, shedding 1000’s of {dollars} within the course of. This truth alone signifies that this pockets is probably going not managed by the Bahamian authorities or regulators, as they might wish to protect belongings for the sake of FTX’s collectors. Solely a malicious actor would deliberately incur slippage on trades to forestall belongings from being seized. 

Moreover, the hacker additionally transferred 3,168 BNB to an tackle related to a small Russian crypto trade referred to as Laslobit earlier than sending the funds to the Huobi trade. As for the remainder of the loot, after staying dormant for just a few days, the hacker began swapping ETH for wrapped renBTC and sending it by way of the Ren bridge to the Bitcoin community on November 20. The hacker will possible use a Bitcoin mixing service subsequent to interrupt the chain of traceability to the funds. The hacker additionally started promoting ETH in the marketplace, inflicting the quantity two crypto to drop in worth. They began transferring extra ETH in batches of 15,000 tokens on November 21, sparking fears that they could possibly be getting ready to promote one other portion of their stash. 

Crypto Briefing beforehand reported that the preliminary FTX hacker was Bankman-Fried working underneath the route of the Bahamian authorities, per a November 17 courtroom submitting. Nonetheless, this principle has been solid into doubt in gentle of extra substantial on-chain proof and clues included in courtroom filings from each John J. Ray III and Bahamian regulators.

It now seems that it was truly the second tackle transferring funds out of FTX that was doing so to guard the trade’s remaining belongings. It’s value noting that the habits of those two wallets is strikingly totally different. Whereas the primary pockets has swapped, bridged, and began to launder belongings, the second has merely transferred tokens to a multi-signature pockets. 

Particulars surrounding how FTX was hacked are nonetheless unclear. Judging by the timing of the hack instantly following the agency’s chapter, some have speculated the hacker could possibly be a disgruntled former worker who had entry to FTX’s accounts. Nonetheless, it’s simply as possible that somebody unconnected to FTX might have taken benefit of the disruption within the firm to assault, probably gaining entry by way of tricking staff into opening malware-ridden emails in the course of the chapter confusion. Earlier high-profile hacks attributed to North Korean state-sponsored hacker Lazarus Group have used this system. It’s possible that as FTX’s chapter case progresses, extra data will come to gentle relating to how the trade was hacked and who’s accountable. 

Disclosure: On the time of scripting this piece, the creator owned ETH, BTC, and several other different crypto belongings.