Ryder Ripps responds to denial of motion to dismiss BAYC trademark lawsuit

NFT

Conceptual artist Ryder Ripps tweeted his response and counterclaims to the lawsuit filed towards him, and fellow defendant Jeremy Cahen, over trademark infringement of the Bored Ape Yacht Membership (BAYC) model.

Ripps highlighted a number of defenses, together with “1st modification safety to unclean arms,” and a rehashing of allegations the BAYC assortment is modeled on Nazi symbolism.

BAYC vs. RR/BAYC

On June 24, BAYC creators Yuga Labs filed a lawsuit towards the defendants citing a number of allegations, together with the false designation of origin, false promoting, cybersquatting, and trademark infringement.

The claims middle across the RR/BAYC NFT assortment, which seemingly options an identical imagery to the unique BAYC NFT assortment. RR/BAYC was created by Ripps weeks earlier than Yuga Labs filed the lawsuit.

On the time, Ripps stated his RR/BAYC assortment set about difficult notions of mental property because it applies to digital paintings. Extra so, sparking debate round “the character of NFT, provenance and digital possession,” to which provenance is a defining facet of artwork valuation, whereas additionally serving to to derive that means within the artistry itself.

On Dec. 16, Choose John F. Walter, of the District Courtroom of Central California, half denied and half granted an anti-SLAPP movement to strike and movement to dismiss, initially filed by Ripps and Cahan on Oct. 3.

Choose Walter denied all features of the defendants’ submitting, besides the movement to dismiss in relation to the eighth reason for motion – unjust enrichment.

The case had 11 causes of motion in complete, these being false designation of origin, false promoting, cybersquatting, frequent legislation trademark infringement, common legislation unfair competitors, unfair competitors, false promoting, unjust enrichment, intentional interference with potential financial benefit, and negligent interference with potential financial benefit. That means Ripps and Cahan are nonetheless on the hook for the remaining ten causes of motion.

The choose made his order based mostly on the submission of papers with out both celebration presenting an oral argument.

A Yuga Labs spokesperson gave Crypto the next assertion in response to the choose’s order:

“Our lawsuit to carry Ripps and Cahen accountable for his or her apparent and blatant theft of Yuga Labs’ emblems rightfully strikes ahead with this ruling. The courtroom agrees that their heinous lies are unrelated to the case and don’t give them carte blanche to infringe upon our marks. They deliberately misled shoppers and made thousands and thousands by utilizing Yuga’s mental property to market and promote copycat NFTs. We are going to proceed to show these details because the case progresses.”

Ryder Ripps responds

The defendants filed a protection and counterclaims response to Choose Walter’s ruling on Dec. 27, by which they sought a jury trial.

The 55-page doc went into element on 16 particular factors that assist their case. They have been:

• safety underneath First Modification rights
• truthful use
• BAYC imagery missing distinctiveness
• Yuga Labs abandoning its marks
• acquiescence and/or estoppel
• unclean arms ensuing from BAYC being illegal, together with classification as an unregistered safety
• the applicability of a doctrine of waiver
• equitable estoppel
• plaintiff’s claims constituting unjust enrichment
• lack of justification based mostly on RR/BAYC being conceptual and efficiency artwork
• the defendants’ rights to make use of “disputed property” for conceptual and efficiency artwork functions
• the defendants’ good religion
• Yuga Labs’s failure to mitigate earlier than authorized motion taken
• unfair apportionment of damages, in the event that they exist in any respect
• speculative damages

Ripps’s tweets additionally made allegations of intimidation and harassment, equivalent to threats from a Yuga Labs agent known as Man Oseary, and the corporate co-founders Greg Solano and Wylie Aronow making slanderous remarks towards the defendants throughout a podcast.

The defendants search a dismissal of the case and counterclaim for damages as a result of emotional misery and misplaced time, amongst a number of different requests.

“