WSJ editorial slams SEC’s ‘bewildering’ Bitcoin ETF denials
The Wall Avenue Journal Editorial Board has come out swinging in opposition to Gary Gensler’s “legendary” resistance to approving a spot Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded fund (ETF).
The hard-hitting opinion piece, printed on Wednesday, called out the Gensler-led Securities and Change Fee (SEC) for overt inconsistencies in how the fee handles purposes for Bitcoin-related exchange-traded merchandise (ETPs) in comparison with extra conventional property and different commodities.
Up to now, Gensler’s SEC has rejected each proposal for a spot Bitcoin ETP, together with two within the final week from Grayscale and Bitwise, which resulted in Grayscale launching authorized motion in opposition to the SEC.
The editorial board mentioned the SEC hold-up was much more “bewildering,” given the company had permitted a number of ETPs for Bitcoin futures final yr.
These constant rejections led SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce to declare Gensler’s resistance to identify crypto ETPs as “changing into legendary,” questioning:
“At what level, if any, does the growing maturity of the Bitcoin spot markets and the success of comparable merchandise elsewhere tip the size in favor of approval?”
The editorial board has additionally drawn consideration to a two-pronged method employed by Gensler, which makes it virtually not possible to get a spot Bitcoin product permitted.
This contains requiring ETP sponsors to reveal {that a} important quantity of Bitcoin buying and selling happens on a regulated market or that the underlying market should “possess a singular resistance to manipulation past the protections…of conventional markets.”
In keeping with the WSJ, Gensler is “totally conscious” that the primary standards merely can’t be met as a result of virtually all Bitcoin buying and selling presently happens on unregulated crypto exchanges.
The second criterion can also be extraordinarily tough for sponsors to fulfill because the SEC has “arbitrarily established” a better commonplace for spot Bitcoin ETPs with out “explaining fulfill it.”
Associated: The US Dept. of Commerce has 17 questions to assist develop a crypto framework
Eric Balchunas, a senior ETF analyst at Bloomberg, advised his 107,000 Twitter followers that it was “good to see” the WSJ echo related ideas to his ETF analyst colleague James Seyffart — claiming that Gensler is “holding innovation hostage” to take management of the crypto market.
Good to see the @WSJ editorial board immediately echo @JSeyff‘s observe from April that Gensler is holding spot bitcoin ETFs (and innovation) hostage so he can get management of crypto market h/t @ToddRosenbluth pic.twitter.com/wUEr7AdnpU
— Eric Balchunas (@EricBalchunas) July 7, 2022
The piece comes one week after Grayscale launched authorized motion in opposition to the SEC for denying its software to launch a spot Bitcoin ETF — claiming that the SEC’s inconsistent guidelines regarding spot and futures Bitcoin ETPs contradict the legislation’s requirement that regulators apply “constant remedy to related funding automobiles.”
